William Lane Craig's explanation of the Moral
Argument is this:
- If God does not exist, objective moral values and
duties do not exist.
- Objective moral values and duties do exist.
- Therefore, God exists.
If
there weren't objective moral values, then no one would have legitimacy in
denouncing horrific acts committed by those like ISIS and Al Qaeda. This
would be true because deciding right and wrong would be based on opinion.
Without a moral law giver (God), then whatever each individual deems
acceptable would have to be the rule we live by. A society based on such
a principle would no doubt be a terrifying and dark place. Even in our
morally law based world of today, there are still horrific acts of violence;
however, how much worse would it be if not for our objective morals?
There is an undeniable distinction between humans
and animals. This distinction goes far beyond the physical attributes of
survival we would have developed through evolution. As people, we have a
built in sense of what is morally right and wrong, whereas animals possess no
such attribute. Since we were made in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27),
it would be illogical to think that our moral instincts come from anywhere but
Him. The Apostle John told us that "God is love" (1 John 4:8).
So if God is love, and we were created in His image, then it is only
natural that our moral principles were divinely given to us. If you
accept that certain things are right and others wrong, then the only possible
explanation for our existence is that we were created by God.
No comments:
Post a Comment